Durbin, Duckworth, Illinois Delegation Members Push USDA To Boost Farm Conservation Funds For Illinois
USA sends more farm conservation dollars to other states than Illinois, a top farming state—funds that could address dust storms, fertilizer runoff, and prepare for climate-smart markets
SPRINGFIELD – U.S. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), a member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), and U.S. Representatives Nikki Budzinski (D-IL-13), Eric Sorensen (D-IL-17), and Jonathan Jackson (D-IL-01), all members of the House Committee on Agriculture, led members of the Illinois delegation in sending a letter to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Thomas Vilsack to express concerns about the low level of farm conservation funds that USDA historically provides to Illinois and called for a major increase that matches the ranking of Illinois as a top agricultural state.
“We request that USDA double, even triple, the percentage of nationwide conservation funding allocated to Illinois,” wrote the lawmakers. “We also urge USDA to revise its program rules to better recognize the conditions specific to Illinois agriculture so that participation in these critical farm conservation programs can be rapidly expanded in our state.”
The Illinois lawmakers highlighted urgent agricultural environmental issues in Illinois, including dust storms that create hazardous driving conditions, missed targets for reducing fertilizer runoff into waterways, and new markets for climate-smart farming, such as supplying the new low-carbon vehicle fuel markets in Pacific Coast states and low-carbon jet fuels like Sustainable Aviation Fuels. If Illinois were to receive USDA conservation funds in proportion to its planted cropland, farmers would have increased access to incentives for conservation tillage, improved fertilizer practices, and other activities that trap carbon, reduce runoff, stabilize soils, and expand cover crops that could reduce the damage of dust storms. Last May, a dust storm in Central Illinois resulted in a 70-car pile-up crash that resulted in the injury of 37 people and the death of eight.
“Illinois ranks fourth in the nation in planted cropland, but from 2018 to 2022, Illinois ranked just 37th nationally in funds sent by USDA … to help farmers adopt cover crops, conservation tillage, and other critical environmental practices. USDA NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service] sends a larger percentage of national conservation dollars to Illinois’ neighboring farm states. Some in Congress are seeking to double federal payments in the Farm Bill to the one percent of southern farmers who historically have grown cotton, rice, and peanuts; USDA NRCS sends a larger percentage of conservation dollars to those states, too, which have two-to three-times fewer planted acres of crops compared to Illinois,” the lawmakers wrote.
The lawmakers highlighted the historical $20 billion provided by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) for USDA conservation programs, writing, “of the first $2 billion installment USDA distributed nationwide, Illinois was provided only $48 million, or two percent. Texas, with a similar amount of planted cropland to Illinois, was provided $166 million in conservation funds—nearly eight percent of the national total and nearly four times more than Illinois—for projects that some groups have criticized as negligible for addressing climate change.”
The lawmakers emphasized that USDA must correct the administration of its conservation programs.
“In addition, USDA must rethink how these conservation programs are administered, because the current one-size-fits-all approach does not work in Illinois,” the lawmakers wrote. “Illinois farms have a tremendous diversity of terrain, soils, moisture, microclimates, weather patterns, and cropping practices. USDA, however, requires all farms, regardless of location, to adopt uniform, inflexible ‘standards’ to be eligible for reimbursement for adopting these conservation practices.”
“USDA must boost the percentage of conservation funds sent to Illinois to match our status as a top farming state. USDA also must simplify its rules to accommodate Illinois farmers and place greater emphasis on achieving environmental results in a swift timeframe: millions of new acres of cover crops, conservation tillage, and fertilizer reduction practices installed in Illinois, in the next few years,” the lawmakers concluded their letter.
Joining Durbin, Duckworth, Budzinski, Sorensen, and Jackson in sending the letter were U.S. Representatives Robin Kelly (D-IL-02), Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14), Sean Casten (D-IL-06), Danny Davis (D-IL-07), Bill Foster (D-IL-11), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL-08), Mike Quigley (D-IL-05), and Delia Ramirez (D-IL-03).
Full text of the letter is available here and below:
August 8, 2024
Dear Secretary Vilsack:
We are writing to express our concerns that Illinois, one of the top states in the nation for agriculture planted acres, receives a disproportionate share of funds from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) for critical farm conservation incentives. We request that USDA double, even triple, the percentage of nationwide conservation funding allocated to Illinois. We also urge USDA to revise its program rules to better recognize the conditions specific to Illinois agriculture so that participation in these critical farm conservation programs can be rapidly expanded in our state.
Illinois ranks fourth in the nation in planted cropland, but from 2018 to 2022, Illinois ranked just 37th nationally in funds sent by USDA for the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP), a program that provides incentives to help farmers adopt cover crops, conservation tillage, and other critical environmental practices. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) added $20 billion to USDA NRCS conservation programs. Of the first $2 billion installment USDA distributed nationwide, Illinois was provided only $48 million, or two percent. Texas, with a similar amount of planted cropland to Illinois, was provided $166 million in conservation funds—nearly eight percent of the national total and nearly four times more than Illinois—for projects that some groups have criticized as negligible for addressing climate change.
USDA NRCS also sends a larger percentage of national conservation dollars to Illinois’ neighboring farm states. Some in Congress are seeking to double federal payments in the Farm Bill to the one percent of southern farmers who historically have grown cotton, rice, and peanuts; USDA NRCS sends a larger percentage of conservation dollars to those states, too, which have two-to three-times fewer planted acres of crops compared to Illinois.
Illinois faces pressing agricultural environmental issues. Illinois increasingly experiences severe dust storms during planting season. In 2023, eight people tragically lost their lives in a violent 84-car pileup on Interstate 55 caused by a major dust storm. This year, at least three hazardous dust storms have closed major interstates in Illinois after causing dangerous visibility conditions for drivers. Also, since 2015, Illinois has worked to reduce fertilizer runoff into waterways that cause hypoxia, or the “dead zone,” in the Gulf of Mexico. Illinois and Iowa are the two top contributors (15 percent each) to nitrogen runoff in these waterways. Illinois published a progress report last year that concluded, once again, the state will miss its runoff reduction goals.
Moreover, farmers in Illinois also are working to adjust to policies that now require climate-smart farming for eligibility. New programs such as the Low Carbon Fuels Standard requirements in California, Oregon, and Washington, and the carbon-reduction designs of the new Sustainable Aviation Fuel federal tax credit require farmers to dramatically expand the adoption of climate-smart practices to be eligible for participation, like cover crops, conservation tillage, and fertilizer reduction. Better access to USDA’s conservation funding would assist in these efforts.
In addition, USDA must rethink how these conservation programs are administered, because the current one-size-fits-all approach creates challenges in Illinois. Illinois farms have a tremendous diversity of terrain, soils, moisture, microclimates, weather patterns, and cropping practices. USDA, however, requires all farms, regardless of location, to adopt uniform, inflexible “standards” to be eligible for reimbursement for adopting these conservation practices, such as blanket instructions on total density of cover crop seeds to be planted per acre; or whether a seed can only be planted by drones, drilling, or broadcasting, and when.
The cost of cover crops adds up quickly for seed, fuel, labor, removal, and time, and cover crops often cannot be sold to recover those costs. Farmers must test the right cover crops that do not interfere with crop insurance, yields, or tight planting windows for corn or soybeans. Couple these challenging dynamics with USDA’s low funding allocations to Illinois, cumbersome program rules, federal staffing shortages, and application processing backlogs, and many Illinois farmers are discouraged from applying for these USDA incentives altogether—and if they do, one estimate says 40 percent of valid Illinois applications go unfunded by USDA.
While more farmers are adopting conservation practices, there is a long way to go: of the 22 million acres of cropland in Illinois, cover crops are planted on fewer than one million acres, and conservation tillage and fertilizer approaches are on about eight million acres. Congress provided USDA with an extraordinary investment in farm conservation funds due to the urgency of climate change, dust storms, and runoff. USDA must boost the percentage of conservation funds sent to Illinois to match our status as a top farming state. USDA also must simplify its rules to accommodate Illinois farmers and place greater emphasis on achieving environmental results in a swift timeframe: millions of new acres of cover crops, conservation tillage, and fertilizer reduction practices installed in Illinois, in the next few years.
We look forward to working with you to achieve these improvements and thank you for your attention to this important issue.
Sincerely,
-30-