06.28.22

Durbin, Grassley, Blumenthal, Lee Seek Information About Antitrust And Minor League Baseball

In a letter to the Executive Director of Advocates for Minor Leaguers, the Senators ask how the 100-year old MLB antitrust exemption impacts the Minor Leagues

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee; U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee; U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Chair of the Subcommittee on The Constitution; and U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights, today sent a bipartisan request for information regarding the impact of Major League Baseball’s (MLB) antitrust exemption on minor league players and teams.  In a letter to Harry Marino, Executive Director of Advocates for Minor Leaguers, the Senators sought information about the impact of this unique exemption on a range of issues affecting Minor League players, including lockouts and work stoppages, contract rights, treatment of international prospects, and team contraction.

“May 29, 2022 marked the 100-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s unilateral creation of Major League Baseball’s (MLB) antitrust exemption in the case Federal Baseball Club v. National League,” the Senators wrote.  “As we mark this anniversary, we write to seek information about how baseball’s antitrust exemption is impacting competition in the labor market for minor league ballplayers as well as the operations of minor league teams.” 

Advocates for Minor Leaguers is a nonprofit organization that seeks to improve working conditions for minor league baseball players.  In their letter, the Senators request information to help inform the Senate Judiciary Committee’s analysis of the century-old baseball antitrust exemption.

The Senators concluded, “We appreciate your attention to this timely issue and look forward to working with you to ensure that players, communities, and fans can continue to enjoy America’s pastime.”

This letter also comes after the Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in the minor league contraction antitrust case Nostalgic Partners, LLC v. The Office of the Commissioner of Baseball.  In its statement of interest, the Department called the antitrust exemption an “aberration” that “does not rest on any substantive policy interests that justify players and fans losing out on the benefits of competition.”

Full text of the letter to Executive Director Marino is available here and below.

 

June 28, 2022

 

Dear Mr. Marino:

May 29, 2022 marked the 100-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s unilateral creation of Major League Baseball’s (MLB) antitrust exemption in the case Federal Baseball Club v. National League.^[1]  As we mark this anniversary, we write to seek information about how baseball’s antitrust exemption is impacting competition in the labor market for minor league ballplayers as well as the operations of minor league teams.  Your answers will help inform the Senate Judiciary Committee’s analysis of the necessity of this century-old exemption. 

We ask that you provide answers to the following questions by July 6, 2022:

 

1. Aside from baseball, do any American professional sports have a general exemption from the antitrust laws?
2. What effect does the antitrust exemption have on the incidence of lockouts and work stoppages at the MLB level, and what impact do these incidents have on minor league players and teams?
3. MLB requires all minor league players to sign a Minor League Uniform Player Contract.^[2] 
4. What role, if any, does MLB’s antitrust exemption play in enabling this conduct?
5. Please discuss the impact of the antitrust exemption on the negotiation of minor league players’ length of contract, wages, housing, or other working conditions.  What effect would removing the antitrust exemption have on minor league player working conditions?
6. If a more tailored approach, like extending the Curt Flood Act to cover minor league players, was taken, what would be the impact?
7. Recent reports, including an article in The Athletic entitled “‘A failed system’: A corrupt process exploits Dominican baseball prospects. Is an international draft really the answer?” have identified rampant corruption and abuse in the market for international prospects, from giving performance-enhancing drugs to teenagers to shady dealings between scouts and trainers.^[3]  To your knowledge, how widespread are these practices?  And what role, if any, does MLB’s antitrust exemption play in creating the conditions that enable these practices?
8. In lobbying for the Save America’s Pastime Act (SAPA), MLB claimed the bill was necessary to prevent minor league contraction.^[4]  However, despite its enactment, prior to the 2021 baseball season, dozens of minor league teams lost their affiliations with MLB clubs as a result of its reorganization of the minor leagues.^[5]
9. How did this reorganization affect minor league baseball players?
10. Did the antitrust exemption play any role in MLB’s ability to restructure the minor leagues in this way?
11. What effect would repealing SAPA have on the minor leagues and minor league players?
12. Is there any other information that you believe could help inform the Senate Judiciary Committee’s analysis of MLB’s century-old antitrust exemption?

We appreciate your attention to this timely issue and look forward to working with you to ensure that players, communities, and fans can continue to enjoy America’s pastime.

 

Sincerely,

 

-30-

• Print
• Email
• Tweet